RationalGRL: A Framework for Rationalizing Goal Models Using Argument Diagrams
نویسندگان
چکیده
Goal modeling languages, such as i* and the Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL), capture and analyze high-level goals and their relationships with lower level goals and tasks. However, in such models, the rationalization behind these goals and tasks and the selection of alternatives are usually left implicit. To better integrate goal models and their rationalization, we develop the RationalGRL framework, in which argument diagrams can be mapped to goal models. Moreover, we integrate the result of the evaluation of arguments and their counterarguments with GRL initial satisfaction values. We develop an interface between the argument web tools OVA and TOAST and the Eclipse-based tool for GRL called jUCMNav. We demonstrate our methodology with a case study from the Schiphol Group.
منابع مشابه
The RationalGRL Toolset for Goal Models and Argument Diagrams
Problem Statement. The Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL) aims at modeling high-level business and system goals, subgoals and tasks and analyzing the alternative ways of achieving these goals and subgoals. However, GRL models are only the end product of a modeling process, and they do not provide any insight on how the models were created. For instance, they do not show what reasons were...
متن کاملArgumentation-based Methodology for Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL)
Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL) aims to capture goals and non-functional requirements of stakeholders and analyzing alternative solutions for realizing these goals. GRL also documents the rationale behind selecting certain goals or alternatives. However, it does not have any means to document and trace back all of the arguments that occur during the stakeholder’s discussion process. T...
متن کاملInterpreting the Validity of a High-Stakes Test in Light of the Argument-Based Framework: Implications for Test Improvement
The validity of large-scale assessments may be compromised, partly due to their content inappropriateness or construct underrepresentation. Few validity studies have focused on such assessments within an argument-based framework. This study analyzed the domain description and evaluation inference of the Ph.D. Entrance Exam of ELT (PEEE) sat by Ph.D. examinees (n = 999) in 2014 in Iran....
متن کاملThe Effect of Argument Mapping Instruction on L2 Writing Achievement across Writing Tasks and Writing Components: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners
Argument maps as schematic representations of arguments and their logical and evidential relationships are effective diagrams for instruction in education as well as in L2 development. However, their use for teaching L2 writing in EFL contexts has not been adequately studied. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of argument mapping instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ writing achieveme...
متن کاملUML Profile for the WebGRL Requirements Model and EA- OOH Design Models
The growing need for web applications has resulted in their development in an adhoc manner. A systematic method of Information Systems development is not being followed. As a result the applications thus developed focus mostly on the design and presentation aspects and do not meet the real goal and expectations of the stakeholders. We present a Web based Goal Oriented Requirement Engineering ba...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016